By Star Boe, Instructional Design Specialist
Objectives can go by many names. Learning Objectives, Outcomes, Learning Outcomes, Student Learning Objectives (SLO), Student Learning Outcomes (also SLO) are just some of the terms you will hear. While some educators feel strongly about one term over another, I am going to just proceed with the generic term “objectives.”
Let me explain what I mean when I use the term objective. Dictionary.com defines objective as “something that one’s efforts or actions are intended to attain or accomplish; purpose; goal; target.” The connection to effort and intention go well with the expectations we have for students as they engage with our material. However, I don’t like the connection that is drawn to “goal.”
Instructors often start with a goal. Goals are broad and often aspirational, such as:
Goals are a fine place to want to end up, but courses need additional structure if you want students to reach these goals.
Think of goals like the roof of a house. The overall protection and coverage it offers is critical, but to be effective, it needs to be built on top of walls. Objectives are the walls or framework of your course. With a good framework in place, you have the necessary support for the roof.
Objectives need to be observable and measurable. One way to get started in the right direction is to begin your objectives with an action verb. There are many lists of action verbs available online. Often these verbs are grouped together into levels based on Bloom’s Taxonomy.
An accessible long description of Bloom’s Taxonomy image is available.
Bloom’s pyramid is arranged from lower order thinking skills up to higher order skills. Beginning level courses are more likely to focus on the lower order thinking skills. As course numbers get higher, the thinking level should be higher as well.
When you are selecting verbs, keep in mind how they fit with your planned assessments. Since your objectives will be observable and measurable, you will want to make sure your assessments are measuring each student for their level of attainment on each of the objectives.
For example, if one objective was: “The student will describe the stages of mitosis,” yet your unit test was 50 multiple choice questions, you have not provided the students with an opportunity to describe the stages of mitosis. You can’t say the student attained the objective because the type of assessment didn’t line up with stated objective.
This 4.5 minute Writing Learning Objectives video does a great job of bringing all of these concepts together.
One reason is to prepare for your course review. At Vol State all online and hybrid courses are reviewed using the Quality Matters Rubric. A key characteristic that QM requires in a course is alignment.
Quality Matters explains it this way:
“The concept of alignment is intended to convey the idea that critical course components work together to ensure that learners achieve the desired learning outcomes. Measurable course and module/unit learning objectives or competencies form the basis of alignment in a course. Other elements of the course, including those addressed in Standards 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, and 6.1, contribute to the accomplishment of the learning objectives or competencies.”
Another, even more important, reason to invest time and energy into your objectives is that it builds intentionality into your course. Your students will know what is expected of them, and you will know how you will assess them for content mastery.